Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Capital Intensity, and Tax Avoidance: An Empirical Study of Banking Transparency

Authors

  • Yovita Kristanti Magiyono Accounting Study Program, Indonesian College of Economics, Jakarta
  • Erna Lovita Accounting Study Program, Indonesian College of Economics, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58777/rag.v4i2.561

Keywords:

Independent Board of Commissioners, Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Institutional Ownership, Capital Intensity, Tax Avoidance

Abstract

This study examines the effects of independent boards of commissioners, boards of directors, audit committees, institutional ownership, and capital intensity on tax avoidance in Indonesian banking companies during 2020–2024. The study is motivated by concerns over persistent tax avoidance despite corporate governance regulations. The banking sector was selected because of its strategic role in economic stability and strict regulatory environment, making governance transparency particularly important. This research also addresses inconsistent findings regarding the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms in reducing tax avoidance. A quantitative associative approach was employed using secondary data from banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Purposive sampling yielded 20 companies, resulting in 100 firm-year observations. Panel-data regression analysis was conducted using EViews. The results indicate that independent boards of commissioners, institutional ownership, and capital intensity have significant negative effects on tax avoidance, suggesting that stronger independent oversight, greater institutional investor participation, and higher fixed-asset intensity discourage aggressive tax practices. In contrast, the board of directors and audit committee have no significant effect. These findings contribute to the corporate governance and agency theory literature by highlighting the importance of governance quality in reducing tax avoidance and promoting greater tax transparency in Indonesia's banking sector.

References

Alfandia, N. S., & Putri, P. A. (2023). Audit committees, political connections, and audit quality on tax avoidance. Journal of Management Science (JMAS), 6(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.35335/jmas.v6i2.225

Alkholil, H. P. P. N., & Sulistyowati, S. (2022). Pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan, tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan, kinerja keuangan, dan koneksi politik terhadap penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung, 772–793.

Alnasvi, D., & Sastrodiharjo, I. (2023). Pengaruh kualitas audit, komite audit, dan kepemilikan keluarga terhadap agresivitas pajak dan dampaknya terhadap timeliness. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 15(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.35384/jkp.v15i2.303

Alya, & Yuniarwati. (2021). Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, leverage, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap tax avoidance. Jurnal Multiparadigma Akuntansi, III(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.24912/jpa.v3i1.11398

Anjelina, J. (2022). Pengaruh capital intensity, leverage, dan profitabilitas terhadap tax avoidance: Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur sektor industri barang konsumsi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2017–2020. Prosiding: Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31253/ni.v1i2.1567

Ambarukmi, K. T., & Diana, N. (2017). Pengaruh size, leverage, profitability, capital intensity ratio, dan activity ratio terhadap effective tax rate (ETR). Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi, 06(17), 13–26.

Aji, A. W., Erawati, T., & Dewi, N. S. (2021). Pengaruh pemahaman perpajakan, love of money, dan religiusitas terhadap keinginan melakukan penggelapan pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 12(3), 101–113. http://ejournal.unibba.ac.id/index.php/AKURAT

Andini, R., Andika, A. D., & Pranaditya, A. (2021). Analisa pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, proporsi dewan komisaris independen, dan profitabilitas terhadap penghindaran pajak dengan ukuran perusahaan sebagai variabel moderating: Studi empiris pada industri barang konsumsi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015–2019. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 22(2), 529–537. https://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/3193

Apsari, A. A. A. N. C., & Supadmi, N. L. (2018). Pengaruh kompensasi eksekutif, koneksi politik, dan capital intensity pada tax avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 25(2), 1481–1505. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2018.v25.i02.p25

Ardyanti, P. W. (2023). Pengaruh komite audit, jumlah rapat komite audit, keahlian komite audit dan masa jabatan komite audit terhadap manajemen laba. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 12(3).

Asadanie, N. K., & Venusita, L. (2020). Pengaruh koneksi politik terhadap penghindaran pajak. INVENTORY: Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.25273/inventory.v4i1.6296

Astika, I. B. P. (2009). Hubungan keagenan dan hukum besi dalam manajemen laba. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 4(2).

Bella, P. L., & Machdar, N. M. (2025). Dampak liquidity dan capital intensity terhadap tax avoidance. Ekonomi Keuangan Syariah dan Akuntansi Pajak (EKSAP), 2(1), 21–32.

Bernandhi, R., & Muid, A. (2014). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, kebijakan dividen, leverage, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(1), 1–14.

Budiantoro, H., Santosa, P. W., Zhusrin, A. S., & Lapae, K. (2022). Pengujian Pentagon Fraud terhadap Kecurangan laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). ASSETS, 12(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.24252/assets.v1i1.27587

Candra, J., Anita, J., Widya, & Katharina, N. (2021). Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, kinerja keuangan, capital intensity, inventory intensity, green accounting terhadap corporate tax avoidance pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2017–2020. Jimea | Jurnal Ilmiah Mea (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 5(3), 15–33.

Dewi, C. S., & Estrini, D. H. (2024). Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, leverage, dan profitabilitas terhadap penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Maneksi, 13(1), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.31959/jm.v13i1.2150

Dewi, S. L., & Oktaviani, R. M. (2021). Pengaruh leverage, capital intensity, komisaris independen dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap tax avoidance. Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v4i2.122

Dwiyanti, I. A. I., & Jati, I. K. (2019). Pengaruh profitabilitas, capital intensity, dan inventory intensity pada penghindaran pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 27(3), 2292–2321. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2019.v27.i03.p24

Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704

Fathurrahman, A., W. A., & Sari, R. D. P. (2021). Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, komite audit, dan thin capitalization terhadap tax avoidance. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(8). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201

Fitriani, D. R. (2021). Praktek rent seeking (pemburu rente): Praktek politik dan bisnis di kalangan birokrasi. E-Journal Universitas Subang, 3(2). http://ejournal.unsub.ac.id/index.php/keuangan

Furi, G. D. (2018). Pengaruh leverage, ukuran perusahaan, inventory intensity, capital intensity ratio, sales growth, dan komisaris independen terhadap tax avoidance: Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014–2016. JOM FEB, 1(1), 1–15.

Gazali, A., Karamoy, H., & Gamaliel, H. (2020). Pengaruh leverage, kepemilikan institusional dan arus kas operasi terhadap penghindaran pajak pada perusahaan tambang yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2014–2019. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 11(2), 83–96.

Gula, V. E., & Mulyani, S. D. (2020). Pengaruh capital intensity dan deferred tax expense terhadap tax avoidance dengan menggunakan strategi bisnis sebagai variabel moderasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar Ke-3, 2, 43.1–2.43.7. https://doi.org/10.25105/pakar.v0i0.6882

Hanim, H., & Fatahurrazak. (2018). Pengaruh dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, dan kompensasi dewan komisaris dan direksi terhadap tindakan agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Finansial Indonesia, 1(2), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.31629/jiafi.v1i2.1243

Ishak, A. C., & Asalam, A. G. (2023). Pengaruh koneksi politik, capital intensity, dan corporate social responsibility disclosure terhadap tax avoidance. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(4), 3041–3051. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1720

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Finance Economics, 3, 305–360. http://www.nhh.no/for/courses/spring/eco420/jensenmeckling-76.pdf

Marsha, F., & Ghozali, I. (2017). Pengaruh ukuran komite audit, audit eksternal, jumlah rapat komite audit, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap manajemen laba. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 6(2), 1–12.

Santosa, P. W. (2020). The Effect of Financial Performance and Innovation on Leverage: Evidence from Indonesian Food and Beverage Sector. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 11(22), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2020.11.38

Santosa, P. W., Rahayu, S. I., Simon, Z. Z., & Tambunan, M. E. (2021). The moderating role of audit quality and firm size in the effect of corporate governance on related party transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(4), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.15

Santosa, P. W., Setianingrum, A., & Yusuf, C. (2022). Corporate governance and leverage on firm value : Evidence of Indonesian large firms. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 26(4), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v26i4.7764

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17

How to Cite

Magiyono, Y. K., & Lovita, E. (2026). Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Capital Intensity, and Tax Avoidance: An Empirical Study of Banking Transparency . Research of Accounting and Governance, 4(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.58777/rag.v4i2.561

Issue

Section

Articles