Research of Accounting and Governance

Influence of Government Performance, Accessibility of Financial Reports and the Financial Accounting System on Financial Report Accountability

Megania Kharisma — 2025-06-30

This study aimed to examine how government performance, financial accounting systems, and financial report accessibility affect the accountability of financial reports in Palmerah Village. A quantitative research method was employed, using a sample of 47 respondents and data collection through questionnaires. The findings reveal that all three factors government performance, financial accounting systems, and report accessibility have significant and partial impacts on financial accountability. The study offers valuable implications for village officials and government institutions. Improving accountability requires enhancing the performance of government personnel through continuous training, implementing technology-based financial accounting systems, and ensuring public access to financial reports. These steps are vital for building public trust and promoting transparent and efficient financial governance at the village level. This research is original in its specific focus on Palmerah Village, a location rarely studied in the context of financial accountability. By addressing real-world challenges faced by local governments and the public's access to financial data, the study provides new empirical evidence and practical guidance. It contributes to better understanding and improving public sector governance in small-scale administrative units.

State Expenditure or Political Agenda? A Critical Analysis of APBN Priorities at the Onset of a New Government

Rahmad Mardianto — 2025-06-30

This study analyzes spending priorities in the 2025 State Budget at the outset of the new government in Indonesia, aiming to evaluate whether budget allocations truly reflect the long-term needs of society or are predominantly influenced by short-term political interests. A primary concern is the potential for budget deviations to be utilized as a means of enhancing political image, advancing populist initiatives, or rewarding political allies. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative analysis of State Budget data and welfare indicators with qualitative analysis of policy narratives and public opinion. The findings reveal that the infrastructure and social assistance sectors have seen significant budget increases, particularly in areas that benefit the ruling government. In contrast, the education and environmental sectors received comparatively less attention. This pattern suggests a political spending approach that is not fully aligned with national development planning documents. The implication is that the State Budget risks becoming a political tool rather than a genuine instrument of development. The originality of this study lies in its focus on the onset of a new government period, employing a combination of analytical and critical approaches to uncover the tendencies toward the politicization of the state budget.